Weblog
Monday, 02 November 2009
-
SHE AIN'T HAPPY . . . SHE'S MY MOTHER
the day is long
with things that i find and learn
that toilet leads who knows where
with my underwear
but i'm strong
strong enough to bury them
she ain't happy
she's my mother
so on we go
i won't share or wait my turn
and so we have torn our stuffed bear
stuff everywhere
and i know
she will not let me watch TV
she ain't happy
she's my mother
if i'm obeying at all
i'm obeying with sadness
but oh, my mom's heart
isn't filled with gladness
of love for me and my brother
it's a long, long road
from here to maturity
at this rate i'll be nine-three
and still won't get there
for i'm wrong
more often than i do right
she ain't happy
she's my mother
she ain't happy
she's my mother
Saturday, 31 October 2009
-
PARENTING FAIL
so, our three boys went Trick-or-Treating this evening. Tony, the sullen early teen, was dressed as a teenager from the hood. Andrew, our energetic and outgoing six-year-old actor, was Spiderman, complete with cute character immersion. Isaac, his younger brother, had a sheet with holes in it, and he plodded and mumbled from house to house.
when we got back to the house, it was clear that they did not have equal amounts of candy. Andrew, who had gone to several more houses than the other two, had a rich reward for his creative work. Tony, who didn't bother to go up to the door of at least half of the residences, had very few. i suspected that he had eaten a few of his pieces when i wasn't looking, even though they had been strictly instructed not to eat anything until we got home and i could inspect it all.
so, the three dump their treasures on the table. Andrew can't wait to dig in, but little Isaac starts crying when he sees Andrew has more than he does. Tony is sullen. he's a teen. i do some counting and some inspecting. Andrew has 60 pieces, Isaac has 30, and Tony has 10. i do a quick safety test by tasting one of each of their bounties. Tony complains that my so-called inspection fee is a higher percentage for him, and i tell him i'm glad that he understands math at last.
Isaac is simply inconsolable, and Tony will never be happy. so, i step in and make a parenting decision: Andrew will give 10 pieces to Isaac and 10 to Tony. How's that? Now Andrew has 39, Isaac has 39 and Tony has 19. Isaac is consoled at last, but now Andrew is upset. he says he went to extra houses and literally ran the whole time. he thinks he should get more than Isaac, who plodded and held back. i tell him to get over it and eat. but it's clear by he end of the first piece he is not enjoying what he has. i took some of his favorites when i took 20 pieces away from him.
after some time of bickering and disagreement, i make a fatherly declaration: "okay, everyone dump your candy into this bucket!" then i deal it back to them (minus a Whining While Dining Surcharge Fee). now Tony has 30, Isaac has 30, and Andrew has 30. "not fair!" screams Andrew (who now has only half of his original earnings) and Isaac (who is down 9 from the last round). Tony is satisfied and tries to explain to his brothers that this system is fair. see, it's the most fair, because now everyone has the same.
they go around for a long time, and finally i declare: "we're going to do this democratically. who here thinks we should go back to the original way?" Andrew raises his hand. "now, who thinks we should split it up evenly like this?" the other two raise their hands.
"there it is. fair, and democratic. now, i'm going to take 5 pieces from each of you so it will be even, and you can eat and enjoy."
i walked out of the room, knowing i had just seen an important demonstration of economic theory at work. i had taught the boys that free enterprise brings about class envy, so it is bad. i had demonstrated to them that a more controlled economy in which the wealthy are taxed heavily and the wealth redistributed makes the middle class happy, though it costs in additional governmental fees. and i had taught them that socialism is the fairest system of all, especially when the under-achieving masses vote for it in a democratic process. twenty-five pieces for everyone, including dad. not a bad piece of work.
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
-
CONTROL OR FREEDOM?
i have been saying it lately, but let me say it again, with feeling:
control and freedom are mutually exclusive. a controlled economy (socialism) leads to oppression, and eventually it leads to genocide. keep watching, and you'll see it happen.
how to get from point A to point Unthinkable? one step at a time. we are somewhere around point G, i think. that's up from point F, where we were just a year ago.
take note: there ain't no such thing as a free lunch. no gift without strings attached. that's true of your grandmother, it's true of big business, and it's true of Big Government (BG). watch the new slate of czars over the next few years, and you will see it in action.
so, if BG takes over GMAC, even if they own only 65% of it, they claim the right to dictate salaries, to set finance charges, to enforce emissions standards, and to, well, control every aspect of the company. and its employees.
socialism works. it really does. but only if everyone is on the same page.
what happens to those who are NOT on the same page? no need to look at history for examples. we can look at today's news and see it.
last week, it was an independent news agency. in a country where freedom of the press is a right, BG goes out of its way to tell us that a watchdog news agency is not legitimate. why not? because they are independent? should we create a BG news agency, so that we will all hear only true truth? how is that different from propaganda? okay, for now it is only rhetoric. what's next? for that, you can study history. next is step H.
today, it was a new hate crime bill. while i agree with the bill's ethics (i think. i haven't read it), i don't agree with the political philosophy that drives it. is it not already illegal to murder someone? do we need to tack on a 15-yard penalty and loss of down for unsportsmanlike conduct, as well? but who defines such unsportsmanlike conduct? might i guess that it starts with a B and ends with a G (or a t, to be more accurate but less clear)?
for the moment, i am not concerned with what is "right" and what is "wrong," but rather with who decides those two concepts. and who enforces them. and who decides how severe the enforcement should be.
the price of freedom is vigilance.
Thursday, 15 October 2009
-
THE LORD JESUS CHRIST (EPHRAIM OF SYRIA, 377, adapted)
That day He voided every Sabbath,
He healed the Gentiles with His life
Even as Samson chose to love and take the alien as his wife.
Lest we judge His choice unclean
Or think The Prophet took a harlot,
Righteous men should hold their peace. For
Did the Prophet turn and wash the guilty from their acts of scarlet?
Justice bade Him bear their sins: He
Even pitied sinful men,
So He restored them without cost: Within the Law, not without loss.
Until He made low every hill of
Shame, raised every dale, and such were we. Can grace be judged?
Can this One be the Lord of Truth?
His servants live within His shadow;
Round about wherever He searched
In day, by night, He found self-will; for all alike were under sin.
Since all the Light had dwelt in Him,
Their shadows were made light and all alike are brought true Sabbath once again.
Tuesday, 13 October 2009
-
NASM IS DONE!
for months, we have been working hard to prepare our Optional Response to the National Association of Schools of Music. at last, we have finished it and mailed it off. time to celebrate.
so, i did a little Bible study, and was surprised to find how many references to Optional Response to the NASM were in the New Testament.
"then the woman said, 'rejoice with me, for i have mailed off my Optional Response to the NASM!'"
"a man had two sons. he said to each of them, 'go and send your Optional Response to the NASM.' the first one said, okay, i will send my Optional Response to the NASM right away.' but then he didn't send his Optional Response to the NASM. the other son said, 'no, i will not send my Optional Response to the NASM.' later, he relented and sent his Optional Response to the NASM. now, which son did the will of his father?" "the one who changed his mind and sent off the Optional Response to the NASM?" "go, then, and do likewise."
"now there abide these three: faith, hope and Optional Response to the NASM. but the greatest of these is the Optional Response to the NASM."
the Optional Response to the NASM is offensive to the Jews and foolishness to the Greeks. but to those in the music and worship department at CCU, it is life.
well, anyway, it was sent off today. nuff sed.
kenread
-
- Name: Ken Eugene
- Country: United States
- State: Ohio
- Metro: Cincinnati
- Member Since: 11/3/2005
Weblog Archives
Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save"
above and refresh the page.

